JavaScript Free Code
Showing posts with label Referendum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Referendum. Show all posts
Cuba
"A majority of Cubans want the death penalty abolished."
At the beginning of July, Havana Times put forward a new initiative: to find out what Cubans think about different national and/or global issues. As far as we know, only the government and government institutions carry out surveys; the results of these are not normally very accessible to ordinary Cubans.

The aim of our project is to contribute towards public opinion surveys not being administered by a centralized body and that the results of these are made easily accessible to everyone. We kicked off this project with a simple survey where the person taking it didn't have to give any personal information; all they had to do was mark the option they believed to be correct with a cross.

We chose to begin with the death penalty, because it's a very sensitive and important issue when building a civilized country. In Cuba, capital punishment was abolished by the 1940 Constitution and was later reinstated in 1959; the last executions of this kind took place in 2003 and since then there has been a de facto moratorium, even though Raul Castro publicly reminded us that it still exists, 3 years ago.

The 1st question of the survey looked into whether the death penalty should remain or be abolished from our Penal Code.

A slight majority of 52% of those surveyed would like it to be abolished, 35% want this kind of punishment to apply to a more limited number of crimes and 13% stand up for it to stay in our Penal Code just as it is.

Among those who would like to get rid of the death penalty entirely, 17% believed this wasn't a corrective measure; 48% believed that it's a violation against out most basic individual human rights and 35% think that life sentences should be the maximum punishment given for any kind of crime.

Those who defend the death penalty believe that it's a necessary evil (16%); believe that it prevents serious crimes from being committed and ensures civil peace (24%); and the majority, (60%), think that Life Imprisonment is not enough to punish someone in extreme cases.

Who should decide whether the death penalty is abolished or remains in the Penal Code? 85% of those surveyed think that a public referendum is the best way to settle these kinds of issues; 4% believe that it's an issue that lawyers should agree on, and 11% trust that the government should be who decides.

Conclusions

From our survey's results, we can see that the majority want the death penalty to be abolished. However, this isn't a great majority, the difference is very small (52% against 48%) and this could change if we had surveyed a greater number of people.

The main argument used by those against the death penalty is that it denies the person being punished their most basic individual human rights.

Amongst those who defend the death penalty, the main justification given is that life imprisonment isn't enough for certain crimes.

The immense majority of those interviewed believe that this issue should be resolved by a popular referendum, before leaving it to be decided by judges or the government.

The sample taken for this investigation is not representative of the Cuban people because of its small scale and because of the bias that including only people who have access to an email address implies; a minority sector with certain socio-cultural characteristics. 

Nevertheless, we are happy with this survey because it's our 1st attempt to make this kind of very sensitive information accessible to Cubans. We hope that we are able to contribute a little to their emancipation in this way.

Source: Havana Times, July 28, 2016

? | Report an error, an omission; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; send a submission; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running!


"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed, but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." - Oscar Wilde

What do Cubans think about the death penalty?

Nebraska: Gathering signatures against the repeal
Nebraska: Gathering signatures against the repeal
LINCOLN, NE � Republican State Senator Colby Coash said today that Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson�s statement that there is no way to know how long it would take for the Legislature to get the death penalty functioning again should voters approve bringing it back, is further proof there will never be another execution in Nebraska no matter what voters decide in November.

Last week, KFXL-Fox news caught up with Peterson at the Buffalo County Fair, and reported: �Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson says even if voters do vote to bring back the death penalty, it could still take quite awhile to enforce it.�

�Nebraska�s last execution was in 1997, just shy of 20 years ago. In those two decades, we�ve had enthusiastically pro-death penalty governors, attorney generals, and majorities in the Unicameral who have pledged to get our death machine up and running. Yet we�ve not been able to it make it happen, in our 19 years of trying, we�ve not been able to fix the system,� Coash said. �And there is no reason to think that will change, ever.�

�This was a driving force for the supermajority of Senators - 16 Republicans, 13 Democrats, and 1 Independent - who voted to end our death penalty system last year. We�ve all studied the issue and its history carefully. We have spent years and years attempting to find a constitutional execution method, and �fix� the system. But it wasn�t possible,� Coash said.

Attorney General Peterson�s predecessor claimed a quick fix was coming 7 years ago:

�According to Attorney General Jon Bruning, executions could resume as quickly as one or two years from now.� May 29, 2009, 10/11 News

�That �one or two years� has now become 7 years. In the last 57 years, here have only been 3 executions in Nebraska.�

�To his credit, Attorney General Peterson understands the hard reality of ever carrying out an execution again. One year ago, Gov. Pete Ricketts used state funds to spend $54,400 for the purchase of drugs from India; however, the Food and Drug Administration blocked the purchase. In May, pharmaceutical company Pfizer announced that it was blocking the use of all its drugs for lethal injections. All federally approved drugmakers in the U.S. whose medications could be used for executions have now put them off limits,� Coash noted.

�Voters should know they�re not voting to fix a system,� Coash said. �They�re voting to keep a system that hasn�t worked for 20 years and will continue to not work should the Legislature�s decision be reversed.�

Source: Retain a Just Nebraska, August 1, 2016. Retain a Just Nebraska is a public education campaign to urge the retention of LB 268, the Nebraska Legislature�s vote to end the death penalty. Supporters include fiscal conservatives, law enforcement officials, faith leaders, murder victims� families, and Nebraskans from all walks of life. It is a statewide coalition conducting public education on the smart alternative of life in prison without parole, which protects society without the many problems of our death penalty system.

? | Report an error, an omission; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; send a submission; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running!


"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed, but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." - Oscar Wilde

Nebraska AG admits even if voters bring back the death penalty he can�t predict when or if Nebraska could execute anyone